Yaffa Family Law Group
By: Doreen Yaffa

Co-parenting in the time of ‘new normal’


On April 1, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order Number 20-91, more popularly referred to as Florida’s version of the “Stay-at-home Order” that have been issued in many states to eradicate the COVID-19 pandemic. The order, which can affect co-parenting, takes effect on April 3 at 12:01 a.m. and expires at the end of the month unless extended.

As many clients, friends and colleagues grapple with this “new normal,” many divorced and/or separated families who are co-parenting children are concerned as to how this order affects their ability to timeshare.

In response to the inquiries received about co-parenting, here are the highlights of the order and what it means for your family.

First, the executive order restricts Floridians’ movements and personal interactions to those necessary to  obtain or provide essential services, or to conduct essential activities.

The order defines “essential activities” as:

  1. Attending religious services conducted in churches, synagogues and other houses of worship
  2. Consistent with social distancing guidelines, participating in recreational activities such as walking, biking, hiking, fishing, hunting, running, or swimming
  3. Taking care of pets
  4. Caring for or otherwise assisting a loved one or friend.

The order makes it very clear that a social gathering in a public space is not an essential activity. It restricts the congregation of groups larger than 10 people in any public space.

The essential activity of caring for a loved one can be interpreted in a number of ways. Is caring for your child on your designated time-sharing considered an essential activity? Arguably, yes.

Will I be penalized for picking up or dropping off my child for timesharing? Most likely, not. However, when possible, parents should make their best attempts at co-parenting. We are dealing with the reality of this pandemic, so this is not a black-or-white issue. There is no specific right or wrong answer.

Can I be held in contempt of my court order for a failure to exercise my timesharing if I am concerned about exposure of the virus to/from myself, my child and/or any other person in my household who is elderly and/or has a compromised immune system? Arguably, no. It is unlikely that a judge will consider these circumstances an intentional and/or willful violations of your court order.

As parents, we must ask ourselves whether it is best for our child or children to remain at one home for an extended amount of time so that we contribute our best efforts to reduce the spread of this virus. We also want to be flexible when it comes to affording the other parents make-up time or whether applying hard, fast rules will turn out best.

While families have their own issues and turmoil, we must see this as an opportunity to teach our children many useful lessons of life, especially in times like these where every day is unpredictable. “Lead by example,” as they say.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

About Your Family Law Matter

(561) 276-3880

Yaffa Family Law Group Boca Raton Main Office

301 Yamato Road #2190

Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Fort Lauderdale

By Appointment Only
Fort Lauderdale, FL


By Appointment Only
Wellington, FL

Palm Beach

By Appointment Only
Palm Beach Gardens, FL


By Appointment Only
Miami, FL


1 SE Ocean Boulevard Stuart, FL 34994

© 2024 · Yaffa Family Law Group. All Rights Reserved | Attorney Marketing By: Stephen Gardner SEO Consulting | Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy
*Completing and submitting this form or otherwise contacting our law firm does not create an attorney-client relationship with us. Our law firm cannot represent you until we determine there is no conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able and willing to represent you. Please do not send any confidential information or documents until we have agreed to represent you and have notified you that an attorney-client relationship has been established. Any information or documents sent to the law firm via this website or otherwise before we notify you that we have agreed to represent you cannot be treated as confidential or protected information. Information submitted to us before we have agreed to represent you and notified you of that fact will not bar us from representing or continuing to represent someone whose interests are adverse to yours in connection with your case.